Ladder Of Community Participation3/16/2021
The reverence for democracy across the globe is even such that all sorts of regimes call themselves democratic nowadays.Italy Project: Participation and Representation Authors: Ammar Maleki 6.75 Tilburg University B.
Ladder Of Community Participation Download Citation CopyEnserink 21.8 Delft University of Technology Arienne Naber 1.96 Delft University of Technology Download full-text PDF Read full-text Download full-text PDF Read full-text Download citation Copy link Link copied Read full-text Download citation Copy link Link copied Abstract Predicating a democratic institutional framework, good governance is about the quality of the processes of decision making. Based on a Rawlsian interpretation of justice, these public values arguably have a universal character. At the same time, the classic interpretation of democracy typically reflects a WesternEuropean perspective, highly valuing citizen involvement in decision making, even codifying citizen participation in legislation. Either implicitly or explicitly the assumption is: The higher we move up Arnsteins ladder of citizen participation the better. Democracy is so popular, that for some states it is now a formal goal of foreign policy to help establish democracies abroad. Among political scholars, this had led to distinguishing between democracy with adjectives, ranging from authoritarian, neo-patrimonial, or military-dominated forms of democracy on the one hand, to more substantive, inclusionary, participatory, deliberative democracy on the other (Collier and Levitsky on cit.). As these qualifications may suggest, the good governance standards of transparency, accountability and participation pan out differently in different political and cultural contexts. But, can we justify our imposing of Western style democratic governance and participation practices on other cultures Can we transplant our democratic institutions to other nations; what is the democratic deficit that justifies our interference and how do we perform ourselves Referring to the Economists Democracy Index, this paper problematizes good governance in terms of a discrepancy between demand for and realization of democracy. Ladder Of Community Participation For Free Public FullDiscover the worlds research 17 million members 135 million publications 700k research projects Join for free Public Full-text 1 Content uploaded by Ammar Maleki Author content All content in this area was uploaded by Ammar Maleki on Jul 13, 2015 Content may be subject to copyright. Based on a Rawlsian interpretation of justice, these public values arguably have a univ ersal character. At the same time, the classic interpretation of democracy typically reflects a W esternEuropean perspective, highly valuing citizen involvement in decision making, even codifying citizen participation in legislation. Among politica l scholars, this had led to distinguishing between democracy with adjectives, ranging from authoritarian, neo-patrimonial, or military-dominated forms of democracy on the one hand, to more substantive, inclusionary, participatory, delibe rative democracy on the other (Collier and Levitsky on cit.). But, can we justify our imposing of W estern style democratic governance and participation practices on other cultures Can we transplant our democratic institutions to other nations; what is the democratic deficit that justifies our interference and how do we perform ourselves Referring to the Economist s Democracy Index, this paper problematizes good governance in terms of a discrepancy between demand for and realization of democracy. KEYWORDS Good governance, citizen participation, culture, democracy, Arnstein INTRODUCTION According to the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP, 1 997), good governance is about the process of decision-making and the manner and means by which decisions are implemented. To be considered good governance, decision-making processes have to be participatory, consensus oriented, accountable, transparent, responsive, equitable and inclusive, effectiv e and efficient, and follow the rule of law (see Figure 1). These eight characteristics have to assure that co rruption is minimized in the political process, that the voices of minorities and the most vulnerable in society are heard, and that decisions prudently consider both the present and future needs of society (UNESCAP, 2005; UNDP, 1997). In addition to these qualifications, the A arhus Convention (UNECE, 1998) considers three pillars to be of essence in achieving good governance: access to information, public participation in decision making, and access to justice in environmental matters. All countries should meet these three crucial obligations through the proper establishment of legal frameworks. Following the above definitions, we can safely conclude that the generally accepted definition of good governance implicitly necessitates a democratic institutional framework. Delft University of T echnology, T echnology, Policy and Management 2 Tilburg School of Politics and Public Administration, Tilburg University 3 Delft University of T echnology, T echnology, Policy and Management 1. Democracy is so popular, that for some W estern countries it is now a formal goal of foreign policy to help establish democracies abroad as the moral, and sometimes even physical, support for the recent uprisings in countries like T unisia, Egypt, Libya, and Y emen may illustrate.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |